|
Feb 07
2009
|
The Greatest English Premier League Myth UnravelledPosted by Andrew McNair in Serie A, La Liga, EPL |
The amount of foreign players in the Barclays Premier League has been an issue over the last few years with many people suggesting that the amount of foreigners in England was hampering the national team.
I had been inclined to think that way myself until I stumbled on the Inter Milan squad list while researching another article. It was flooded with foreign players and it got me thinking, does England really have too many foreign players and is this actually hampering the national side?
For my research, I took the top four sides (judging by league tables as of the morning of the 7th February 2009) from Spain's La Liga, Italy's Serie A and England's Premier League and worked out how many foreigners they had as individual clubs and national leagues. I chose the top four as these are the players likely to be representing each country in next years UEFA Champions League.
The Stats: Italy
Having first got the idea for this article while looking at Inter Milan, I'll start by looking at Serie A. The current top four in Italy are Inter Milan, AC Milan, Juventus and the surprise package of 2008/2009, Genoa.
Inter Milan's squad is 75% foreign and includes only seven Italians.
AC Milan's squad is 55% foreign.
Juventus's squad is 56% foreign.
Genoa's squad is 64% Italian, with only eight foreign players on their current first team squad.
Overall, the look at this sub section of Serie A shows that 56% of players in Italy's top flight are foreign.
Spain
The top four in Spain is Barcelona, Real Madrid, Sevilla and Valencia.
Barcelona's squad is 54% foreign.
Real Madrid's squad is 64% foreign with only nine Spaniards in the first team.
Sevilla's squad is 70% foreign and they have only eight Spanish players.
Valencia with all their well documented problems have a mainly Spanish squad with only 29% of the first team being foreign.
Overall, the look at this sub section of La Liga tells us that 55% of players in Spain are foreigners.
England
The top four in England is Manchester United, Liverpool, Chelsea and Aston Villa.
Manchester United's squad is 64% foreign.
Liverpool's squad is 77% foreign and only have seven English players in their current first team.
Chelsea's squad is 80% foreign and have only five Englishmen in their top squad.
Aston Villa are 64% English and have only nine foreign players.
Overall, the look at this sub section of the Barclays Premier League tells us that 57% of players in England are foreign.
Does England really have too many foreign players?
England does have the side with the least amount of domestic players (20%) in Chelsea but they are hardly dominating in England right now. Italy's worst is Inter Milan with only 25% of their squad being Italian and they are looking at four league wins in a row. Surely then Italy has more of a problem with foreign imports?
England's most English squad is Aston Villa according to the stats used and that is on a par with Italy's most Italian team Genoa at 64%. Valencia are even better with 71% of their players born in Spain. Proof that you don't need a foreign side to be successful.
Aston Villa are holding off Arsenal (a side with virtually no English players) and are proof that Englishman are capable of holding their own against sides full of the worlds best players. In Italy, Genoa are the Villa, holding off the Fiorentina's and Roma's of this world with a pretty much Italian squad.
In Spain, Sevilla have as many foreigners as Valencia have Spaniards but Valencia are right there behind them, despite being practically bankrupt.
Therefore, I don't believe England has any more of a problem than Spain or Italy.
Is the foreign invasion hampering the national side?
There is certainly not enough evidence to say England can‘t win a major trophy because of the foreigners in the Premier League.
Spain are European Champions and have a league with just 2% less foreigners across their top clubs.
Italy are the World Champions and have a league with just 1% less foreigners amongst their top four sides.
The above totally blows any such claims by the English out of the water.
Whatever/ whoever is to blame for England's failure to qualify for EURO 2008, it simply isn't too many non English players in the Premier League but I do believe that it could be the fact England has only one player in Italy or Spain (David Beckham) while top Spanish and Italian players ply their trades in England and Spain or Italy showing their diversity and ability to adapt.
It appears England players need to get out more as it is no surprise England's greatest global triumph wasn't global at all, it happened in their own back yard.
Comments (2)
Subscribe to this comment's feedSick of this "not enough english players at the top clubs bs"
1) too expensive. top clubs are not going to pay 20 million that the smaller clubs are trying to sell them for
2) there are only a handful of class english players
3) They are too impatient at a young age and leave the big clubs to go to a smaller club for more minutes
4) when talking about english players thats only a small fraction of the number of players playing football around they world. there are more players to choose from around the world than in england
5) the drama a class english player brings with them (ashley cole, david beckham, etc)
6) who would you rather have wayne roonie or messi or torres or eto'o
---- i mean england is tiny compared to the rest of the world. deal with it. the world is globalizing. more and more people are playing football around the world and when it comes to winning nationality is at the bottom of the list
I know it seems simplistic to put the blame on Sky, but...
Has that now come back to bite the England NT on the bum?







